Edit Survey: Managers
Back to SurveysDemo read-only mode: survey content is visible but editing and question changes are disabled.
Demonstrates strategic capacity and alignment with organizational direction.
Strategic Thinking
Future Orientation
Q1
Anticipates long-term risks and opportunities in their area.
Analysis
Factor: Strategic Anticipation
High score: Proactive strategic thinker
Low score: Reactive and short-term focused
Q2
Considers future implications when making recommendations.
Analysis
Factor: Forward Thinking
High score: Recommendations account for the future
Low score: Recommendations are tactical only
Q3
Aligns their team's work with the organization's strategic direction.
Analysis
Factor: Strategic Alignment
High score: Drives alignment at their level
Low score: Disconnected from strategic priorities
Q4
Identifies emerging trends that could create opportunity or risk.
Analysis
Factor: Trend Identification
High score: Brings forward valuable market intelligence
Low score: Limited awareness of emerging shifts
Systems Thinking
Q1
Considers cross-functional impacts before making decisions.
Analysis
Factor: Organizational Awareness
High score: Organizationally aware
Low score: Makes siloed decisions
Q2
Identifies and manages interdependencies effectively.
Analysis
Factor: Dependency Management
High score: Effective project management mindset
Low score: Misses dependencies that cause delays
Q3
Sees patterns and connections that others might miss.
Analysis
Factor: Pattern Recognition
High score: Insightful and analytical
Low score: Misses hidden patterns
Q4
Understands the political landscape and navigates it effectively.
Analysis
Factor: Political Acumen
High score: Savvy organizational navigator
Low score: Naive about organizational dynamics
External Awareness
Q1
Stays current on industry developments relevant to their role.
Analysis
Factor: Professional Currency
High score: Continuously learning and current
Low score: Knowledge is becoming outdated
Q2
Incorporates external best practices into their work.
Analysis
Factor: Best Practice Adoption
High score: Benchmark-driven improvement
Low score: Relies on existing methods only
Q3
Understands customer needs and reflects them in decisions.
Analysis
Factor: Customer Orientation
High score: Customer-centric decision-making
Low score: Internally focused decisions
Q4
Identifies competitive threats and opportunities.
Analysis
Factor: Competitive Intelligence
High score: Contributes market intelligence upward
Low score: Limited competitive awareness
Decision Quality
Analytical Rigor
Q1
Uses data effectively to support recommendations.
Analysis
Factor: Data-Driven Leadership
High score: Evidence-based approach
Low score: Relies on intuition over data
Q2
Provides thorough analysis before seeking decisions from me.
Analysis
Factor: Analytical Preparation
High score: Well-prepared and thorough
Low score: Presents incomplete analysis
Q3
Identifies risks and presents mitigation options.
Analysis
Factor: Risk Management
High score: Proactive risk management
Low score: Ignores or downplays risks
Q4
Evaluates trade-offs clearly when presenting options.
Analysis
Factor: Trade-off Analysis
High score: Clear options with pros and cons
Low score: Presents single options without alternatives
Judgment Under Uncertainty
Q1
Makes sound decisions within their authority level.
Analysis
Factor: Delegation Confidence
High score: Can be trusted with delegated authority
Low score: Needs excessive guidance
Q2
Knows when to escalate and when to handle things independently.
Analysis
Factor: Escalation Judgment
High score: Appropriate escalation frequency
Low score: Escalates too much or too little
Q3
Remains effective and focused when dealing with ambiguity.
Analysis
Factor: Ambiguity Tolerance
High score: Maintains effectiveness under uncertainty
Low score: Performance degrades without clarity
Q4
Balances speed with thoroughness in decision-making.
Analysis
Factor: Decision Efficiency
High score: Well-calibrated decision speed
Low score: Too slow or too hasty
Accountable Choices
Q1
Takes full ownership of their area of responsibility.
Analysis
Factor: Ownership Breadth
High score: Full ownership without gaps
Low score: Selective ownership of comfortable areas
Q2
Communicates proactively about problems rather than hiding them.
Analysis
Factor: Problem Transparency
High score: No surprises, early escalation
Low score: Hides problems until they escalate
Q3
Delivers on commitments made to me and the leadership team.
Analysis
Factor: Upward Reliability
High score: Highly dependable
Low score: Missed commitments create trust issues
Q4
Takes accountability for mistakes without making excuses.
Analysis
Factor: Error Accountability
High score: Models accountability for their team
Low score: Makes excuses or deflects
Consistently delivers results and maintains high standards.
Accountability & Delivery
Ownership Mindset
Q1
Consistently delivers results that meet or exceed expectations.
Analysis
Factor: Results Delivery
High score: Reliable high performer
Low score: Inconsistent results
Q2
Manages their team's performance effectively.
Analysis
Factor: Team Performance Management
High score: Team performs well
Low score: Team underperforms
Q3
Sets and achieves ambitious but realistic goals.
Analysis
Factor: Goal Setting
High score: Stretches while remaining achievable
Low score: Goals too easy or unrealistic
Q4
Prioritizes effectively across competing demands.
Analysis
Factor: Prioritization
High score: Focuses effort on highest-value work
Low score: Struggles with competing priorities
Performance Discipline
Q1
Maintains high standards of quality in their work.
Analysis
Factor: Quality Standards
High score: Consistently high quality
Low score: Quality issues require intervention
Q2
Identifies and resolves problems proactively.
Analysis
Factor: Proactive Problem-Solving
High score: Self-sufficient problem solver
Low score: Waits for problems to escalate
Q3
Drives continuous improvement within their area.
Analysis
Factor: Continuous Improvement
High score: Always raising the bar
Low score: Complacent with status quo
Q4
Operates efficiently with resources provided.
Analysis
Factor: Resource Efficiency
High score: Gets maximum value from resources
Low score: Wasteful or always asking for more
Reliability
Q1
Delivers on schedule consistently.
Analysis
Factor: Timeline Adherence
High score: Reliable delivery cadence
Low score: Frequently delayed
Q2
Can be relied upon during critical periods or crises.
Analysis
Factor: Crisis Reliability
High score: Steps up when it matters most
Low score: Unreliable under pressure
Q3
Provides accurate status updates and forecasts.
Analysis
Factor: Reporting Accuracy
High score: Trustworthy reporting
Low score: Inaccurate or overly optimistic reports
Q4
Executes direction effectively, adding value in the process.
Analysis
Factor: Directive Enhancement
High score: Improves on direction given
Low score: Follows direction mechanically
Communicates effectively upward and manages stakeholders well.
Communication & Alignment
Upward Communication
Q1
Communicates concisely and effectively to leadership.
Analysis
Factor: Executive Communication
High score: Clear, concise reporting style
Low score: Communication is unclear or too detailed
Q2
Provides the right level of detail — neither too much nor too little.
Analysis
Factor: Information Calibration
High score: Well-calibrated reporting
Low score: Over-reports or under-reports
Q3
Raises concerns early and proposes solutions.
Analysis
Factor: Solution-Oriented Escalation
High score: Brings solutions, not just problems
Low score: Only raises problems without solutions
Q4
Keeps me appropriately informed without needing to be asked.
Analysis
Factor: Proactive Reporting
High score: Self-managing communication flow
Low score: Requires frequent check-ins
Receptiveness
Q1
Receives and acts on feedback constructively.
Analysis
Factor: Feedback Receptivity
High score: Coachable and growth-oriented
Low score: Defensive or dismissive of feedback
Q2
Seeks clarification when direction is unclear.
Analysis
Factor: Clarification Seeking
High score: Proactive about ensuring alignment
Low score: Proceeds on assumptions
Q3
Is open to changing direction when strategy shifts.
Analysis
Factor: Strategic Flexibility
High score: Adapts well to changing priorities
Low score: Resists strategic changes
Q4
Pushes back on decisions respectfully and constructively.
Analysis
Factor: Constructive Challenge
High score: Trusted advisor who offers honest perspective
Low score: Either too compliant or too confrontational
Stakeholder Management
Q1
Manages relationships with key stakeholders effectively.
Analysis
Factor: Relationship Management
High score: Strong stakeholder relationships
Low score: Stakeholder complaints or friction
Q2
Represents their team's capabilities and challenges accurately.
Analysis
Factor: Accurate Representation
High score: Trustworthy team advocate
Low score: Over-promises or under-represents
Q3
Builds alignment across peer teams without escalating to me.
Analysis
Factor: Horizontal Influence
High score: Self-sufficient in peer dynamics
Low score: Requires manager intervention in peer conflicts
Q4
Represents organizational decisions positively to their team.
Analysis
Factor: Message Alignment
High score: Aligned and supportive of organizational decisions
Low score: Undermines decisions or shows visible disagreement
Shows integrity, emotional maturity, and leadership character.
Leadership Character
Composure
Q1
Handles pressure and setbacks with grace.
Analysis
Factor: Pressure Management
High score: Resilient under pressure
Low score: Struggles visibly under pressure
Q2
Doesn't let emotions cloud their professional judgment.
Analysis
Factor: Emotional Control
High score: Maintains objectivity
Low score: Emotional reactions undermine credibility
Q3
Manages difficult conversations with professionalism.
Analysis
Factor: Difficult Conversation Skill
High score: Handles tough situations well
Low score: Avoids or mishandles difficult conversations
Q4
Maintains composure in ambiguous or rapidly changing situations.
Analysis
Factor: VUCA Composure
High score: Effective in volatile environments
Low score: Destabilized by change and ambiguity
Self-Awareness & Development
Q1
Shows accurate self-awareness of their strengths and limitations.
Analysis
Factor: Self-Insight
High score: Has realistic self-view
Low score: Blind spots in self-assessment
Q2
Actively develops their own capabilities without needing to be told.
Analysis
Factor: Self-Development
High score: Proactive learner
Low score: Requires external motivation to develop
Q3
Invests in developing their team members.
Analysis
Factor: Team Development
High score: Builds capability in others
Low score: Focused on output over development
Q4
Demonstrates learning agility — quickly adapts to new challenges.
Analysis
Factor: Learning Agility
High score: Fast learner in novel situations
Low score: Slow to adapt to new domains
Integrity
Q1
Acts with integrity consistently.
Analysis
Factor: Integrity
High score: Universally trusted for ethical behavior
Low score: Integrity concerns
Q2
Treats all people fairly and with respect.
Analysis
Factor: Fairness
High score: Known for equitable treatment
Low score: Favoritism or bias concerns
Q3
Puts organizational interests above personal gain.
Analysis
Factor: Organizational Orientation
High score: Organization-first mindset
Low score: Self-serving behavior noticed
Q4
Maintains professional boundaries appropriately.
Analysis
Factor: Boundary Management
High score: Professional and appropriate relationships
Low score: Boundary issues creating complications
